Reflecting on the FSF: "Why FOSS is still not on activist agendas"

Hi all. In light of the recent identity crisis faced by Open Source in the past couple weeks with the Free Software Foundation, I remembered this blog post I wrote in December 2019. Recent events have put this in a new light for me, so I thought I would share here since surely many of us are mulling over these issues. :eyes:


On December 13th, 2006, author Bruce Byfield reflected on why he thought Free and Open Source Software (F.O.S.S.) was not on activist agendas. My interpretation of his views are that a knowledge barrier about technology makes FOSS less accessible, the insular nature of activism makes collaboration difficult, and FOSS activists reaching out to other activists with shared values should be encouraged. On December 13th, 2019, is FOSS on activist agendas? The answer is not black or white, but a gray somewhere in the middle. This is my response to Byfield’s article, thirteen years later, on what he got right but also what he left out.

I think FOSS is starting to be on activist agendas. The most notable example is the Dual Power App, which is actively being developed by the Black Socialists in America. The project is currently in the UI/UX phase. Their website was recently updated to reflect its current status.

1 Like

Update on Dual Power App progress even though no one is gonna look at this thread again: Preliminary UI wireframes are done and they are ready to start coding the components and pick a backend database. They currently have their eyes on GraphQL.

It also looks like there is a roadmap and some events about open design planned.

https://dualpower.app/open-design